What Patients Think About Telemedicine

A team of MSK researchers recently published a study in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network comparing patient satisfaction of pre-COVID in-person visits to satisfaction with telemedicine during the pandemic. Both Chief Healthcare Executive and Healthday reported on the study.

Erin Gillespie, MD, consults with a patient using telemedicine.

Radiation oncologist and study co-author Erin Gillespie, MD, consults with a patient using telemedicine. Photo: Richard DeWitt

The researchers compared patient satisfaction survey answers from MSK radiation oncology patients. They found no substantial differences in satisfaction between the in-person and telemedicine groups.

Patients with video visits reported a better understanding of their treatment plans than those with telephone-only visits. Two out of three patients reported lower costs with telemedicine, and patients who were unmarried or had lowered ability to perform activities of daily living were more likely to prefer telemedicine, likely because it did not require travel.

While the authors call for long-term study, they conclude that the data supports post-pandemic continuation of telemedicine use in radiation oncology.

Preprints: Latest News & Useful Tips

International Open Access Week is a good time to revisit preprints and their growing role in the biomedical scholarly communication landscape. Although embraced by researchers in fields like physics for decades, it has only been in the last few years that researchers – and funding agencies – in the biomedical sciences have begun to become more serious about using preprint servers.

How are preprint servers the same or different than open access (OA) journals?

The most important difference is that manuscripts posted to a preprint server have not been confirmed by peer-review, whereas OA journal articles published in reputable scholarly journals will have gone through a rigorous peer-review process before being published. As such, taking extra precautions before citing research that appears only in a preprint version may be merited – for example, checking that it has not been listed in the Retraction Watch database.

That said, most publishers allow manuscripts that have been previously posted as preprints to also be submitted to their journals for eventual publication as a peer-reviewed article. There is even a Preprint/Journal Manuscript matcher tool now available that can help authors who have posted to either bioRxiv or medRxiv preprint servers to use a text-matching automation tool to identify good journal contenders for their preprint server-posted manuscript.

Although both OA journal articles and preprints are freely-available to readers to view and download, posting to a preprint server is free for the authors, whereas most OA journals charge an Article Processing Charge (ACP) or publication fee. Researchers can search the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) for OA journal ACP information.

Both document formats are now also accepted as works that can be cited in NIH awards reporting. The NIH has in fact expanded their working definition of publication to better accommodate “Interim Research Products” like preprints. As per NIH guidance:

Publication: A “Publication” includes (a) published research results in any manuscript that is peer-reviewed and accepted by a journal1 or (b) a complete and public draft of a scientific document (commonly referred to as preprint).2

It is also important to note that most preprint servers will assign a DOI (digital object identifier) to the preprint manuscript that will be different than the DOI that may eventually be assigned to the final published article. As such, the two versions can and should be treated as separate “citable” items that can both be included in a researcher’s author profile(s) and CV.

Select preprints have also begun to be indexed in PMC and PubMed, initially as part of a pilot project for COVID-19 research, but “NLM will expand the pilot to include preprints resulting from the broader spectrum of NIH-supported research as curation and ingest workflows are refined, automated, and made scalable”

Last – ORCiD has also added features and functionality to accommodate preprint citation information in their author profiles. A preprint work type category has been added, as well as the ability for preprint servers that are ORCiD members to transfer citation information into author profiles. Furthermore, linkages within ORCiD can be created once the published article citation information related to that preprint becomes available.

To learn more about preprints, be sure to check out NLM’s new self-paced tutorial on Preprints or Ask Us at the MSK Library!

Mark Your Calendar: International Open Access Week, October 25-31, 2021!

Join the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Library staff in recognizing International Open Access Week being held October 25-31, 2021. This year’s theme, “It Matters How We Open Knowledge: Building Structural Equity,” partners well with the release of UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science.

International Open Access Week, a global event is an opportunity for librarians and information professionals to engage with their communities about the benefits of open access and to increase awareness of the role open access plays in the scholarly communication landscape.

In support of Open Access, we will be featuring five open access publications by MSK authors and will share one each day (Monday to Friday) as a Today’s Science Sparks on the Library Website. You can also browse the Today’s Science Sparks’ archives to find other open access articles.

I would like to highlight Plan S, supported by cOAlition S, an international consortium of research funders with a tagline that states “Making full & immediate Open Access a reality.” The plan requires that scientific publications resulting from research funded by public grants be published in compliant open access journals or platforms. To better understand this movement, check out the Plan S Principles.

You can also discover which open access journal titles MSK authors publish in by looking for the orange open access button in a Synapse work record. If you see the button in a record, this confirms the journal is open access. Synapse is our public-facing and authoritative bibliographic database showcasing the intellectual output of all our researchers.

If you want to participate in the open access week experience, you can follow the conversation on Twitter, as well as share your thoughts. Don’t forget to include the official hashtag — #OAWeek. 

If you have any questions about Open Access, don’t hesitate to ASK US.

Donna Gibson
Director, Library Services