More on Avoiding Plagiarism

As plagiarism continues to be on peoples’ minds, it is probably a good time to take a moment to review the module on ethical writing provided on the website of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity (ORI).

As per the ORI website – https://ori.hhs.gov/avoiding-plagiarism-self-plagiarism-and-other-questionable-writing-practices-guide-ethical-writing:

“Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing

The purpose of this module is to help students, as well as professionals, identify and prevent questionable practices and to develop an awareness of ethical writing. This guide was written by Miguel Roig, PhD, from St. Johns University with funding from ORI.

This module was originally created in 2003 and revised in 2006 and 2015.”

In addition to the HTML version, there is also a downloadable 71-page PDF version, as well as an abridged HTML version entitled 28 Guidelines at a Glance on Avoiding Plagiarism.

Questions related to citing references that often are asked of librarians are nicely addressed in these four items in particular that have been highlighted below:

From https://ori.hhs.gov/28-guidelines-glance-avoiding-plagiarism:

“Guideline 15: Authors are strongly urged to double-check their citations. Specifically, authors should always ensure that each reference notation appearing in the body of the manuscript corresponds to the correct citation listed in the reference section and vice versa and that each source listed in the reference section has been cited at some point in the manuscript. In addition, authors should also ensure that all elements of a citation (e.g., spelling of authors’ names, volume number of journal, pagination) are derived directly from the original paper, rather than from a citation that appears on a secondary source. Finally, when appropriate, authors should ensure that credit is given to those authors who first reported the phenomenon being studied.

Guideline 16: The references used in a paper should only be those that are directly related to its contents. The intentional inclusion of references of questionable relevance for purposes such as manipulating a journal’s or a paper’s impact factor or a paper’s chances of acceptance, is an unacceptable practice.

Guideline 17: Always cite the actual work that is consulted. When the published paper cannot be obtained, cite the specific version of the material being used whether it is conference presentation, abstract, or an unpublished manuscript. Ensure that the cited work has not been subsequently corrected or retracted.

Guideline 18: Generally, when describing others’ work, do not cite an original paper if you are only relying on a secondary summary of that paper. Doing so is a deceptive practice, reflects poor scholarly standards, and can lead to a flawed description of the work described.”

Questions? Ask Us at the MSK Library.

 

Don’t Let Your Search Get Lost In Translation

When conducting a literature search on a topic, many times the search is conducted in more than one database for more comprehensive results. And in the case of systematic reviews, such a practice is required.

Even more challenging, when it comes to systematic reviews, is that the searches in each database should be as similar to one another as possible. The process of taking an original search strategy from one database and making only necessary changes (controlled vocabulary, syntax, field codes), adapt the strategy to another database is referred to as “search translation.”

The Parts of a Search

There are several parts to complex literature searches that combine multiple elements: Boolean operators, nesting, controlled vocabulary, field codes, quotations, proximity, and special operators.

Boolean Operators

Boolean Operators (AND, OR, and NOT) are the basis of how to combine concepts to create a search.

While nearly all databases use Boolean operators in the same manner and meaning, it’s important to know when capitalization is necessary and when it is not.

Nesting

Nesting uses parentheses much in the same way they are used in Algebra — that is, whatever is inside the pair of parentheses must be done first, and from there a search (just like math), will be conducted from left-to-right.

Since nesting is about how to read and execute a search, it typically will not change between databases.

Controlled Vocabulary

Controlled vocabulary refers to the set dictionary of terms for that database, such as MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and EmTree. MeSH is the National Library of Medicine’s controlled vocabulary, and they create the MeSH terms for PubMed. These terms may not always be identical to the MeSH terms found in MEDLINE on another platform though, and they require different identification.

Unfortunately there is no easy way to translate these terms, but using the built in databases (MeSH Database, MEDLINE Term Finder, EmTree Database, etc) you can quickly find the most closely aligned term to use.

Field Codes

Field codes are essentially the special codes for each database that tell the database where to search for that term. For example [tiab] in PubMed tells the database to search that term in the title and abstract fields only. In MEDLINE the title/abstract field code is .ti,ab, whereas in Embase it is :ti,ab.

Quotations

In order to search for a specific phrase searches must use quotations. However, depending on the database, they may require double quotations (“smart quotes”), straight quotations, or single quotations.

Proximity

Proximity operators (also called adjacency in some databases) are essentially a middle-ground between searching across an entire record and specific quotations. They allow the user to select how close they want to two terms to appear in a record. Every database uses slightly different proximity operators and syntax, and some have strict rules with how they can be used.

Special Operators

Special Operators are operators that can be added to search terms to modify what is searched. Examples of special operators are truncation and wildcards, which expand the variations of the specified term that are searched. An asterisk (*) is the common operator for truncation in many databases.

Where to Start

All the information on how to search each database according to its own rules and/or the rules of an online platform it resides on can be found in the database/platform’s Help section.

Typically, this translation of search strategies is done by a librarian manually but automated/semi-automated tools are being gradually introduced. A beta version of such tool (Query Translation) is currently available in Embase.com, the Elsevier interface of the Embase database. It will assist in “translating” PubMed searches into the Embase.com search syntax.

The tool allows entering a search term or the whole search strategy (query) and get it translated to Embase syntax.


New eBook: Gunderson & Tepper’s Clinical Radiation Oncology

The library now subscribes to the 5th edition of Gunderson & Tepper’s Clinical Radiation Oncology

This text is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary resource for the entire radiation oncology team. It covers all aspects of the basic biology of oncologic disease processes as well as updated treatment algorithms, the latest clinical guidelines, and state-of-the-art techniques and modalities. There are over 1,000 images—detailed anatomy drawings, radiographic images, and more

Please note, that eBooks are only readable online on ClinicalKey; in order to download a PDF you will need to create a personal account with Elsevier/ClinicalKey. To register for a new account on ClinicalKey, click the “Register” link in the top right while on the ClinicalKey platform. Enter your name and MSKCC email on the registration form.

If you have any questions or issues, please email resources@mskcc.org