Clarivate Reveals World’s Influential Researchers: 2023 List is Available to View!

Clarivate released its 2023 list of Highly Cited Researchers™. Their evaluation and selection process identified 6,849 researchers from institutions in 67 countries/regions who demonstrate significant influence in their field(s) of interest through their highly cited papers. For the United States this represents 2,669 highly cited researchers with a world share of 37.5%.

Curious on who made this global list from Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK)?  Read on to find out!

The Highly Cited Researchers’ names are drawn from the publications that rank in the top 1% by citations for field and publication year in the Web of Science™ citation index.

I am delighted to share that 41 researchers associated with MSK publications from this year made this prestigious list.  There were 8 researchers on the list that had previously work at the Center but had no MSK-affiliated papers for a few years.

Name Category Name Category
       
Omar Abdel-Wahab Cross-Field Robert J. Motzer Clinical Medicine
Maria E. Arcila Clinical Medicine Dana Pe’er Molecular Biology & Genetics
Michael F. Berger Clinical Medicine Miguel-Angel Perales Cross-Field
Renier Brentjens Cross-Field Michael A. Postow Clinical Medicine
Margaret K. Callahan Cross-Field Natasha Rekhtman Cross-Field
Justin R. Cross Cross-Field Gregory J. Riely Clinical Medicine
Elisa de Stanchina Cross-Field Jonathan Rosenberg Cross-Field
Alexander Drilon Clinical Medicine Alexander Y. Rudensky Immunology
Mithat Gonen Cross-Field Charles M. Rudin Clinical Medicine
Matthew D. Hellmann Clinical Medicine Michel Sadelain Cross-Field
Clifford A. Hudis Cross-Field Nikolaus Schultz Cross-Field
Xuejun Jiang Molecular Biology & Genetics David Solit Cross-Field
Luis A. Diaz, Jr Cross-Field Martin S. Tallman Cross-Field
David S. Klimstra Cross-Field Ying Taur Cross-Field
Mark G. Kris Clinical Medicine Craig B. Thompson Molecular Biology & Genetics
Marc Ladanyi Clinical Medicine William D. Travis Clinical Medicine
Ross L. Levine Cross-Field Marcel R. M. van den Brink Immunology
Joan Massague Molecular Biology & Genetics Agnes Viale Cross-Field
Ingo K. Mellinghoff Cross-Field Jedd D. Wolchok Clinical Medicine, Immunology, Molecular Biology & Genetics
Taha Merghoub Cross-Field Ahmet Zehir Cross-Field
Vincent A. Miller Clinical Medicine    

To view these researchers and other MSK authors, check out Synapse, the authoritative database of MSK publications, showcasing references for journal articles, books, book chapters, conference papers, meeting abstracts, and more.

On behalf of the Library staff, congratulations to these researchers and to all of our distinguished authors, who through their work contribute daily to the ever-growing body of published medical and scientific literature. 

Donna Gibson
Director, Library Services

New Databases: AccessMedicine and AccessSurgery

The library now subscribes to two comprehensive resources, AccessMedicine and AccessSurgery

AccessMedicine provides more than 100 medical reference textbooks, ranging from surgery and pharmacology to basic and clinical sciences. It includes frequently updated content with thousands of images and illustrations, interactive self-assessments, case files, diagnostic tools, and more. Textbooks include Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (21st edition), Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology (12th edition), and Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (14th edition).

AccessSurgery is a comprehensive online surgery resource aimed to enhance medical knowledge and deliver quick answers to surgical inquiries. AccessSurgery provides access to leading surgical textbooks (including Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery and Zollinger’s Atlas of Surgical Operations), instructional surgical videos and animations that show step-by-step how to perform basic and advanced surgical procedures, an Interactive Board Review designed to help residents and clerks prepare for exams, an integrated drug database to look up dosing, indications, and adverse reactions, and a Clerkship Corner that brings together all clerkship specific resources, including text references, case files, and videos on essential concepts and procedures clerks may observe or assist in during their rotation.

The “Smart Quote” Struggle

To Quote or Not To Quote…that is the Struggle

To the average person’s eye quotation marks all look the same, however there are actually two distinct styles of quotation marks: straight and curly (also known as “smart”). The difference is simple, but easily missed.

So what’s the Difference?

Straight quotation marks are single or double vertical lines that frame a word or phrase.

'Straight' or "Straight"

Whereas curly quotation marks are single or double curved lines that change direction depending on if they are framing the beginning or end of the word or phrase. 

‘Curly’ or “Curly”

Visually both of these types of quotation marks function the same way, they signify the beginning and end of a quotation, passage, or phrase. But many publishers prefer curly (also referred to as smart) quotations as they are more pronounced to differentiate the start and end of a passage of text. 

Today, most word processors (i.e. Microsoft Word), automatically change straight quotations to smart quotations as you type. While this automatic feature is meant to make text more legible and in line with publishing standards, when it comes to conducting searches in databases it came make things complicated.

This is especially the case if you are copying and pasting a search strategy from Microsoft Word (or other word processing software), directly into a database. If quotations are automatically changed to curly quotes, it can cause issues with search strategies.

How Literature Databases View Curly (Smart) Quotations

Scholarly databases respond to these curly quotations in one of three ways.

  • The search results are identical whether straight or curly quotations were used
  • The search results varied depending on whether straight or curly quotations were used
  • The search strategy is rejected (error message) due to unsupported characters

This issue can greatly impact searching biomedical literature since curly (smart) quotes are unsupported on the Ovid platform.

Ovid hosts the following biomedical databases:

  • MEDLINE
  • PsycINFO
  • AMED
  • JBI
  • Embase (for some institutions, not MSK)

IMPORTANT: If curly quotes are put into an Ovid database an error message will be returned.

For more information about literature database platforms and how the respond to quotations:

Phrasing in Reproducible Search Methodology: The Consequences of Straight and Curly Quotation Marks
Barrick, K., & Riegelman, A. 2021. College & Research Libraries, 82(7): 978 

 

How to Disable Smart Quotes in Microsoft Word

For: Word 365, Word 2021, Word 2019, and Word 2016

  1. On the File tab, click Options.
  2. Click Proofing, and then click AutoCorrect Options.
  3. In the AutoCorrect dialog box, do the following:
    1. Click the AutoFormat As You Type tab, and under Replace as you type, select or clear the “Straight quotes” with “smart quotes” check box.
    2. Click the AutoFormat tab, and under Replace, select or clear the “Straight quotes” with “smart quotes” check box.
  4. Click OK.