Year-End PubMed Activities

The National Library of Medicine (NLM) is currently involved in PubMed year-end processing activities.

During this time you may find some unusual patterns in what your regular PubMed searches and searches saved in your My NCBI account retrieve.

Annual changes in MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terminology and hierarchy is one of the most important changes that occur during this time. As a rule, some new MeSH and subheadings (qualifiers) are added; a few MeSH terms are deleted, some MESH terms move to other locations in the MeSH hierarchy, etc. For example, a new MeSH “Progression-Free Survival” will be added; “anastrozole” and “letrozole”, currently belonging in Supplementary Concept category, will be promoted to MeSH; a qualifier (subheading) “manpower” will cease to be.

If you have searches saved in your My NCBI account and/or you are getting PubMed e-mail updates, you may want to consult with a Research Informationist to ensure your saved searches are not affected by the annual changes in the MeSH terminology.  Don’t hesitate to ASK US!

To learn more, check out the announcement regarding the year-end processing activities for 2019.

Clarivate Analytics Highly Cited Researchers 2018: Who Made the List From MSK?

The 2018 Highly Cited Researchers Report from Clarivate Analytics (the company behind Web of Science) is an annual list recognizing leading researchers in the sciences and social sciences from all over the world. This year the report includes approximately 6,000 highly cited researchers (last year’s report included 3,400).  In addition, Clarivate Analytics has introduced a new “Cross-Field” category to identify researchers with substantial influence across several fields during 2006-2016.

To learn how a researcher makes this list, take a moment to review their methodology.

I am delighted to share that the following 23 MSK researchers have made the list this year:

Omar Abdel-Wahab Cross-Field
Jianjiong Gao Cross-Field
Frederic Geissmann Immunology
Clifford A. Hudis Clinical Medicine
Mark G. Kris Clinical Medicine
Marc Ladanyi Clinical Medicine
Ross L. Levine Cross-Field
Joan Massague Cross-Field
Robert J. Motzer Clinical Medicine
Eric G. Pamer Immunology
Michael A. Postow Cross-Field
Gregory J. Riely Clinical Medicine
Neal Rosen Cross-Field
Alexander Y. Rudensky Immunology
Charles L. Sawyers Cross-Field
Howard I. Scher Clinical Medicine
Nikolaus Schultz Cross-Field
Sohrab P. Shah Cross-Field
Martin S. Tallman Clinical Medicine
Craig B. Thompson Molecular Biology & Genetics
William D. Travis Clinical Medicine
Agnes Viale Cross-Field
Jedd D. Wolchok Clinical Medicine

On behalf of the library staff, congratulations to these researchers and to all of our distinguished authors, who through their work contribute daily to the ever-growing body of medical and scientific research.

Donna Gibson
Director of Library Services

Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository

If the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository sounds familiar but is not something that you have accessed recently, it may be a good time to return for another look as this freely-available online resource has evolved quite a bit throughout its history. First conceived of in 1979, it began its presence on the Internet in 1995 and had several re-designs over the years as the Virginia Henderson International Nursing Library (1). Re-named the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository in 2013, it was further transformed into the “open-access, full-text academic and clinical repository” that its developers continue to improve and upgrade even today.

From their website:

“The Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository (Henderson Repository) is the only repository solely dedicated to sharing works created by nurses. It is an open-access digital academic and clinical scholarship service that freely collects, preserves, and disseminates full-text nursing research and evidence-based practice materials. The repository is a resource of the honor society of nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International.

All nurses are invited to submit research-related or evidence-based practice works. These works may be authored by a single nurse, multiple nurses, or a collaborative group that includes a nurse. There is no fee to submit, and authors retain copyright to their materials, maintaining control of their work via a self-archiving mechanism.”

The Henderson Repository is a particularly good option for nurses interested in sharing their scholarship since it contains file/document types beyond published articles, including conference presentations, and accepts content from nurses of all degree levels and affiliations. Because it extends beyond the typical content found in commercial publications, this resource has been used as a grey literature source in systematic reviews publications (2, 3). With both basic and advanced search functionality, as well as, extensive browsing options, including by Author, Level of Evidence, and CINAHL Subject Headings, the Henderson Repository interface accommodates both novice and expert searchers.

(1) “Virginia Henderson International Nursing LibraryJournal of the Medical Library Association vol. 94,3 (2006): 360–361.

(2) Burns T, Fernandez R, Stephens M. The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):169-211.

(3) Butler M, Collins R, Drennan J, Halligan P, O’Mathúna DP, Schultz TJ, Sheridan A, Vilis E. Hospital nurse staffing models and patient and staff-related outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD007019.

For more information on this or other MSK Library resources, feel free to Ask Us!