Author Names: Manuscript Submission & PubMed Indexing

Anyone who has ever tackled the task of compiling a comprehensive CV – say of a researcher with a common last name who has published over multiple decades while working at several different institutions – knows that this is no easy task. Below are some reasons for the complexity, and some solutions for making the process more accurate and less daunting for everyone.

How did we get here?

Everyone involved in the research publication process has contributed at some time and in some way to this problem:

  • Authors who haven’t been consistent about the formatting of their name (or formatting of their institutional affiliation) when submitting their manuscripts for publication or have not provided their ORCID iD when prompted by the manuscript submission system;
  • Publishers who don’t provide database producers with full author name information (for example, only providing initials for the authors’ first and middle initials) or only ask for one co-author’s ORCID iD or do not require provision of an ORCID iD at all;
  • Database producers, like NLM’s PubMed, who may have not been consistent over time regarding how they handle adding the author information to their database records (more on that below).

And as with any structured database, information retrieval is only ever as good as the quality and extent of information contained in the database. In the case of PubMed, the quality control at NLM has always been top notch, but the extent of indexing certain fields (like the Author Name filed) has varied over time as their cataloging policies have evolved.

For example:

The take-home message from these cataloging details is that searching in PubMed will therefore need to be adjusted accordingly, depending on the publication dates of the author citations needed to be identified. Furthermore, authors themselves should realize that they are very much in control over what information ends up in the PubMed record since it all starts with the information that they themselves provide at the point of the manuscript submission to a journal publisher.

In fact, a new tool has recently been developed by cancer researchers at the National Cancer Institute called the AuthorArranger that can help authors provide more complete/accurate information to publishers at the time of manuscript submission. “AuthorArranger was created by Mitchell Machiela and Geoffrey Tobias in collaboration with the NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information (CBIIT). Support for AuthorArranger comes from the 2018 DCEG Informatic Tool Challenge.”

From their website:

“AuthorArranger is a free web tool designed to help authors of research manuscripts automatically generate correctly formatted title pages for manuscript journal submission in a fraction of the time it takes to create the pages manually. Whether your manuscript has 20 authors or 200, AuthorArranger can save you time and resources by helping you conquer journal title pages in seconds.

Simply upload a spreadsheet containing author details ordered by author contribution, or download AuthorArranger’s easy-to-follow spreadsheet template and populate it with author and affiliation details. Either way, once your author information is uploaded AuthorArranger will allow you to make format choices based on the submission rules of the journal. When finished, you get a downloadable and formatted document that has all your authors and affiliations arranged for journal submission.”

The AuthorArranger tool was featured in a recent Cell Press “CrossTalk” blogpost.

For help with Author Name searching, manuscript submission, or training on Updating Scientific CVs – just Ask Us!

 

2020 Journal Citation Report Released

The new 2020 Journal Citation Report (JCR) was released on June 29 by Clarivate Analytics, providing the 2019 Impact Factor for journals.  The Impact Factor is based on the ratio of a journal’s citations in a given year to the journal’s total number of citable items from the previous two years. 

The JCR also ranks journals by subjects, enabling us to view journal impact within a specific subject category, such as Oncology.  Shown here are the top 10 journals in Oncology out of the 244 listed in this category, along with the number of MSK-affiliated publications for each journal in 2019. 

  1. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (2)
  2. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (6)
  3. Nature Reviews Cancer (5)
  4. Lancet Oncology (25)
  5. Journal of Clinical Oncology (60)
  6. Cancer Discovery (20)
  7. Cancer Cell (18)
  8. JAMA Oncology (34)
  9. Annals of Oncology (38)
  10. Molecular Cancer (1)

Contact us to find out more about the JCR. 

How PubMed is Democratizing “Expert” Literature Searching

In May 2020, the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) officially launched their updated version of PubMed, making it the default that will replace the legacy version going forward. First released in January 1996, as the Internet was just becoming available to the masses, PubMed has seen multiple redesigns over its almost 25 years of existence. New features have been added and improved upon continuously, with some of these changes more obvious to regular PubMed users than others. 

Millions of people around the World search this freely-available biomedical bibliographic database daily, with both experienced and non-experienced searchers in the mix. One noteworthy change to the updated version (which will likely go unnoticed by most searchers unless they choose to do an Advanced search and look at the Details by clicking on the carrot symbol >), is that PubMed’s search translation functionality (or automatic term mapping) has also been further enhanced.

In fact, the folks at NLM may now have come closer than ever before to elevating the PubMed search queries entered by less experienced searchers to truly “expert searcher” level search statements.

Here’s an explanation – an “expert searcher” typically approaches a comprehensive literature search by making these considerations regarding the concept(s) of interest: they will compile synonyms/subject headings, alternate/foreign spellings, singular and plural forms, and multiple term endings (suffixes), as well as, develop appropriate logic statements (using Boolean operators) to correctly combine these search terms.

Simply by inputting a term or two in the PubMed search box and clicking on the “Search” button, a non-expert can go from, say:

Search: lymphedema prevention 

…a two keyword query that then gets translated behind the scenes by the PubMed search engine into a rather sophisticated search strategy.

Legacy PubMed was already helping improve searches by mapping to relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and to foreign spellings, for example, it would have run this search translated to:

(“lymphoedema”[All Fields] OR “lymphedema”[MeSH Terms] OR “lymphedema”[All Fields]) AND (“prevention and control”[Subheading] OR (“prevention”[All Fields] AND “control”[All Fields]) OR “prevention and control”[All Fields] OR “prevention”[All Fields])

 …however, the updated version of PubMed has expanded the translation functionality to also search for singular/plural forms, as well as, incorporate a bit of truncation (ie. prevent*), allowing for relevant alternate term endings, as in the case here with “prevention”, see:

 ((((“lymphedema”[MeSH Terms] OR “lymphedema”[All Fields]) OR “lymphedemas”[All Fields]) OR “lymphoedema”[All Fields]) OR “lymphoedemas”[All Fields]) AND (((((((((((((((((“prevent”[All Fields] OR “preventability”[All Fields]) OR “preventable”[All Fields]) OR “preventative”[All Fields]) OR “preventatively”[All Fields]) OR “preventatives”[All Fields]) OR “prevented”[All Fields]) OR “preventing”[All Fields]) OR “prevention and control”[MeSH Subheading]) OR (“prevention”[All Fields] AND “control”[All Fields])) OR “prevention and control”[All Fields]) OR “prevention”[All Fields]) OR “prevention s”[All Fields]) OR “preventions”[All Fields]) OR “preventive”[All Fields]) OR “preventively”[All Fields]) OR “preventives”[All Fields]) OR “prevents”[All Fields])

Note: If for some reason a searcher wishes to turn off this query term(s) translation functionality, using quotation marks around each term will keep the automatic term mapping from occurring. For example:

Search: “lymphedema” “prevention” 

…now drops the mapping/translating, and only turns into:

“lymphedema”[All Fields] AND “prevention”[All Fields]

…versus inputting it as a phrase surrounded by quotations:

Search: “lymphedema prevention” 

…which will now stop considering the space between the two terms as an implied Boolean operator AND, and so will keep its integrity and be run only as:

“lymphedema prevention”[All Fields]

See this NLM handout for more Tips for Using PubMed or take one of the MSK Library’s New PubMed classes to learn more.