Library Sponsored Classes at IT EXPO 2017

MSK’S IT EXPO 2017 will be October 30 and 31. Among this year’s training options for staff, the MSK Library will be offering the following four classes:

  1. Analyzing and Visualizing Research Impact
    (Tuesday, October 31 from 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm, RRL-102)

Instructor:  Antonio DeRosa

Course Description: Learn which resources to leverage for analyzing and visualizing the impact of a researcher’s work, specifically focusing on published papers indexed in major databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Synapse). Also become familiar with why you might want to think about visualizing and understanding published data for the purposes of promotion, presentation, publishing, and general understanding of a researcher’s impact on academia or society and the scientific community.

  1. Searching PubMed Effectively
    (Monday, October 30 from 11:00 am to Noon, RRL-102)

Instructor: Marisol Hernandez

Course Description: This workshop will help you gain knowledge to effectively search PubMed utilizing keywords and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Also covered are the built-in filter options, as well as, accessing full-text articles from the MSK Library’s ejournal collection. Continue reading

The Equator Network – Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research

The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is “an international initiative that seeks to improve the reliability and value of published health research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting and wider use of robust reporting guidelines.” Its mission is to “achieve accurate, complete, and transparent reporting of all health research studies to support research reproducibility and usefulness.”

Currently containing 347 reporting guidelines, the “Library for health research reporting provides an up-to-date collection of guidelines and policy documents related to health research reporting. These are aimed mainly at authors of research articles, journal editors, peer reviewers and reporting guideline developers.”

Many people have heard of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and CONSORT which was developed to promote more transparent reporting of randomized controlled trials, but there are many more reporting guidelines in existence that may not be as well known. For example, the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) is one that anyone considering publishing and disseminating the results of a quality improvement project should know about. Here’s why: It is becoming more and more common for journal publishers to strongly encourage adherence to these reporting guidelines. One such journal,The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, includes this information in its Guide For Authors:

“The Journal strongly suggests that authors use standard formats as described at http://www.equator-network.org. For example, use CONSORT for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies, SRQR or COREQ for qualitative studies, CHEERS for economic evaluations, and SQUIRE for quality improvement studies. Authors are strongly encouraged to use the checklists included in these guidelines, and those checklists may be requested during manuscript review to ensure completeness.”

The EQUATOR group has also been working on “compiling specialist collections of resources about reporting for individual specialties”. This oncology specialist collection, called the EQUATOR Oncology Project, “is the first such collection and it is at an early stage of development”. Be sure to check out their “Useful resources and references for oncology researchers”, that include recent “References specifically about reporting issues in oncology”, as well as links to 39 Oncology-related reporting guidelines and their Quarterly Current Awareness Bulletin for oncology clinicians and researchers.

For more information on this and other resources, contact us at the MSK Library!

Epistemonikos Database

As the evidence based information landscape continues to expand at an unprecedented rate, it is not surprising that there is now even a place for systematic reviews of systematic reviews in the literature to support more streamlined clinical decision-making.  To better navigate this expanding landscape, some new “meta” search tools have been developed, including one called Epistemonikos.

Epistemonikos offers a Google-like search box, as well as an advanced search option, and can be search using terms from multiple languages. Epistemonikos is an openly-available database that “gathers information from multiple sources of systematic reviews, broad syntheses of reviews and structured summaries”. Included among its sources are: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database, Campbell Library, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, EPPI-Centre Evidence Library, and SUPPORT Summaries. Continue reading