Thinking about a 3D mammogram?

October is National Breast Cancer Awareness month. As new technologies emerge to detect cancer, decisions about screening options can become more complicated. So what does the research say about 3D mammograms?

A 2019 study found that compared to traditional 2D mammograms, 3D mammograms offer fewer false positives and are more effective in women age 65 and older. Another recent study (2019) found that breast cancers found with 3D mammography were more likely to be smaller and node-negative compared to breast cancers found with standard digital mammography.

Dr. Sandra Brennan. Image courtesy of the MSK Digital Asset Library. Do not reuse.

Breast density also plays a role. Dr. Sandra Brennan, Director of Radiology at MSK Westchester, explains that 3D mammography is better at detecting masses in dense breasts than 2D mammography. Dr. Brennan explains that radiologists have long known about breast density, but that breast density notification laws have prompted this issue to come to the public’s attention. These laws, she says, “came about largely because of patient activism.”

As with all cancer screening questions, you should consult with your doctor. Learn more about mammograms and other types of breast exams offered at MSK.

Metastatic Cancer Cell Migration and More

  • Researchers from Vanderbilt University studied how cancer cells conserve energy during metastatic migration. The “first study to quantify the energetic costs of cancer cells during metastasis” was published in Nature Communications.
  • A team of engineers and cancer biologists from Ohio State University explored the effect of electromagnetic fields on breast cancer cell migration and created tools to hinder the spread of metastatic breast cancer cells  The new study which lays the foundation for further animal and human studies was published in Communications Biology.
  • Researchers from Michigan State University and Stanford University discovered that nano-sized extracellular vesicles produced by healthy cells in human body can transport therapeutic agents (gene-directed enzymes, drug therapies) to cancer cells. This new approach shows great potential for future treatment strategies according to the authors of the study published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
  • New research from a team at Imperial College in London and their colleagues from Italy contributed to the debate on breast cancer recurrence after treatment with hormone therapies. Their findings suggest that adjuvant endocrine therapy, a type of hormone therapy, while killing some cancer cells, only puts others in a dormant state. This study was also published in Nature Communications.

Racial Disparities in Oncology Clinical Trials

A new study in JAMA Oncology reports the existence of racial disparities in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008-2018. The authors state that blacks (22% of expected proportion) and Hispanics (44% of expected proportion) were underrepresented in these trials relative to their proportion among the US cancer population.

Figure 1, Part C: The absolute number of patients of races other than white who participated in pivotal trials leading to FDA approval was considerably low. From: Loree JM, Anand S, Dasari A, et al. Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018. JAMA Oncol. Published online August 15, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1870

Back in 2004, a study published in JAMA indicated that racial and ethnic minorities, women, and the elderly were less likely to enroll in cooperative group cancer clinical trials than were whites, men, and younger patients, respectively. A more recent ProPublica examination showed that black people and Native Americans are under-represented in clinical trials of new drugs, even when the treatment is aimed at a type of cancer that disproportionately affects them.

Dr. Mona Fouad suggests that one possible strategy to increase minority participation in clinical trials may be patient navigators. A 2016 study she co-authored on patient navigation demonstrated that the patient navigation model “holds promise as a strategy to reduce disparities in cancer clinical trial participation” and that “future studies should evaluate it with racial/ethnic minorities across cancer centers.”