Crowdfunding and Other News

In the world of research funding, there have been some interesting news stories of late.

Are you in need of funding for your research? A recent NPR blog post, “Scientists pass the hat for research funding“, highlights an emerging trend for raising research funds – crowdfunding. Scientists at uBiome and American Gut recently raised more than $600,000 using Indiegogo, and other sites have popped up to help steer scientists and donors to this new funding approach. In his June 2012 article, “Crowdfunding: A New Opportunity for Science and Innovation“, John Platt points to a few other funding sites like FundaGeek, TechMoola, RocketHub, and the #SciFund Challenge, which can also serve as communication tools for scientists to explain their work to the public. With continuing cuts in research funding from larger institutions, is this the wave of the future?

In other news, after the US Government Accountability Office audited three federal agencies that provide about 94% of all federal funding for medical-sciences research in the United States and found “a potential for unnecessary duplication”, the authors of  “Research Funding: Same work, twice the money?” conducted an analysis of the potential for doubly funded projects. They compared 850,000 funded grant and contract summaries submitted to five of the largest US funders, and found that 167 pairs reached a certain measure of similarity… and those projects involved $200 million.

Training, Tools, and Tips for Writing Your Grant Proposal

Need to apply for a grant and want support with writing your proposal?  Try starting here.

The National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NN/LM) has a Proposal Writing Support page with links to several training resources, including in-classroom courses and online video tutorials, such as “NIH Peer Review Process Revealed“. The NIH Center for Scientific Review site also provides tools and guides for those tasked with reviewing the applications.

Have You Heard? Changes to NIH Public Access Policy

The NIH public access policy, which requires NIH grantees to provide a full text, electronic copy of their accepted articles to PubMed Central within 12 months of publication, has been in place since 2008. To encourage compliance with this requirement, NIH recently announced that it will “delay processing of non-competing continuation grant awards if publications arising from that award are not in compliance with the NIH public access policy.  The award will not be processed until recipients have demonstrated compliance.”   Continue reading