Search Smarter with the Latest Technology

The amount of published biomedical literature has been growing exponentially for decades, and that trend is not slowing down anytime soon. With this explosion of published content, it can be overwhelming to find exactly what you are looking for.

The 21st Century Digital Age

The start of the 21st century was heralded as the “digital age”, and the growth of content shifted from a linear to an exponential growth model. There were approximately 13 million citations in PubMed at the start of the 21st century. Within the first decade that number rose to 20 million. Today there are over 36 million citations in PubMed. 

Growth of PubMed citations from 1986 to 2010
Source: Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011:baq036. Published 2011 Jan 18.

Zhiyong Lu, from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), wrote about going beyond PubMed back in 2011, and shared an initial overview of web-based tools available that work alongside or on top of PubMed to provide more search functionality to users.

From the Digital Age to the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Today, as we now inch closer to the quarter-century point, digital technology has literally begun taking on a life of its own. With the advent of machine-learning and generative artificial intelligence, suddenly technology itself can create its own content! And while there are plenty of ethical issues surrounding the use and abuse of AI that cover nearly all aspects of life, this technology allows for considerable benefits as well.

New tools have emerged to help us better navigate, digest, and synthesize the overwhelming amount of digital information available, including biomedical literature. Many of these tools are web-based resources that either overlay or work in conjunction with PubMed to provide functionality that goes beyond basic search and retrieval.

Last month, Zhiyong Lu and several of his colleagues from NCBI published an update to his 2011 overview; PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence. This update focused on how user search needs have expanded and AI tools can provide search functionality to address these different needs.

Overview of five specialised search scenarios in biomedicine
Source: Jin Q, Leaman R, Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence. EBioMedicine. 2024;100:104988. 

They looked at five specific types of specialized search needs, and addressed the various tools and resources that can provide necessary functionality to support those search needs: evidence-based medicine, precision medicine, semantic searching, recommendations, and text mining.

Harness Technology with these Search Tools

Using these five identified search needs categories, below are selected resources to assist users in navigating and digesting the ever-expanding field of biomedical research.

Evidence-Based medicine

PubMed Clinical QueriesThis PubMed tool uses predefined filters to help you quickly refine PubMed searches on clinical or disease-specific topics.
Cochrane Clinical AnswersCCA provides readable, digestible, clinically focused actionable point-of-care information directly from Cochrane Reviews.
Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) EBP DatabaseThe JBI EBP Database provides the latest research and evidence-based guidelines regarding patient care, treatment options, and interventions to empower clinicians and healthcare administrators to make informed, confident decisions. 
TRIP DatabaseTRIP is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Precision Medicine & Genomics

OncoSearchOncoSearch is a text mining search engine that searches Medline abstracts for sentences describing gene expression changes in cancers. 
LitVarLitVar normalizes different forms of the same variant into a unique and standardized name so that all matching articles can be returned regardless of the use of a specific name in the query.
DigSeeDigSee is a text mining search engine to provide evidence sentences describing that “genes” are involved in the development of “disease” through “biological events”. With a query of (disease, genes, events), Medline abstracts with highlighted evidence sentences will be retrieved.

Semantic Searching

LitSenseLitSense is a unique search system for making sense of the biomedical literature at the sentence level. Given a query, LitSense finds the best-matching sentences based on overlapping terms as well as semantic similarity via a cutting-edge neural embedding approach.
AskMEDLINESearch PubMed using free-text and natural language
BioMed ExplorerBioMed Explorer applies semantic understanding of the content of the papers to pull out answers and highlight snippets and evidence for the user. 
Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar provides free, AI-driven search and discovery tools, and open resources for the global research community. 

Literature Recommendations

LitSuggestAdvanced machine learning and information retrieval techniques are utilized for finding and ranking publications pertinent to a topic of interest. 
Connected PapersConnected Papers is a unique, visual tool to help researchers and applied scientists find and explore papers relevant to their field of work.

Text Mining

PubTator PubTator Central (PTC) is a Web-based system providing automatic annotations of biomedical concepts such as genes and mutations in PubMed abstracts and PMC full-text articles. 
PubMedKBPubMedKB combines a multitude of state-of-the-art text-mining tools optimized to automatically identify the complex relationships between biomedical entities in the PubMed abstracts.

As technology evolves, so will the research environment, and it’s imperative that we are able to leverage technology to keep up. It’s also important to understand these new technologies, how they work, and how they can be used to make work more efficient. But it’s also important to understand their limitations and the ethical issues that could arise when using these technologies without further human insight.

Searching with Field Codes

While not necessarily “secret”, field codes are an underutilized feature found in nearly all scholarly literature databases. 

A field is a specific part of a record found within a database. A field code (also sometimes referred to as a field tag) is a word, abbreviation, or letters that are tied to a specific field within a record. Some common examples of fields are: title, author, and publication year. Every database has their own set of field codes for the various fields found in their records. Here we discuss how you can leverage these field codes to focus your literature searches.

Adding Field Codes to your Search

The default, or basic search, in most databases, is a general all field or keyword search. While this may be fine for simple searches, as searches become more complex, sometimes there needs to be more options available. That is where field codes come in.

The Advanced Search features found in most databases is where you can manipulate your search strategies to include field codes. In some cases available or common field codes are listed on this page. Depending on the database, you may or may not be able to add multiple field codes to a single search. If you are limited to a single field code, use the Boolean Operator OR to combine multiple search strings. 

Commonly Used Field Codes in Select Databases

Continue reading

The “Smart Quote” Struggle

To Quote or Not To Quote…that is the Struggle

To the average person’s eye quotation marks all look the same, however there are actually two distinct styles of quotation marks: straight and curly (also known as “smart”). The difference is simple, but easily missed.

So what’s the Difference?

Straight quotation marks are single or double vertical lines that frame a word or phrase.

'Straight' or "Straight"

Whereas curly quotation marks are single or double curved lines that change direction depending on if they are framing the beginning or end of the word or phrase. 

‘Curly’ or “Curly”

Visually both of these types of quotation marks function the same way, they signify the beginning and end of a quotation, passage, or phrase. But many publishers prefer curly (also referred to as smart) quotations as they are more pronounced to differentiate the start and end of a passage of text. 

Today, most word processors (i.e. Microsoft Word), automatically change straight quotations to smart quotations as you type. While this automatic feature is meant to make text more legible and in line with publishing standards, when it comes to conducting searches in databases it came make things complicated.

This is especially the case if you are copying and pasting a search strategy from Microsoft Word (or other word processing software), directly into a database. If quotations are automatically changed to curly quotes, it can cause issues with search strategies.

How Literature Databases View Curly (Smart) Quotations

Scholarly databases respond to these curly quotations in one of three ways.

  • The search results are identical whether straight or curly quotations were used
  • The search results varied depending on whether straight or curly quotations were used
  • The search strategy is rejected (error message) due to unsupported characters

This issue can greatly impact searching biomedical literature since curly (smart) quotes are unsupported on the Ovid platform.

Ovid hosts the following biomedical databases:

  • MEDLINE
  • PsycINFO
  • AMED
  • JBI
  • Embase (for some institutions, not MSK)

IMPORTANT: If curly quotes are put into an Ovid database an error message will be returned.

For more information about literature database platforms and how the respond to quotations:

Phrasing in Reproducible Search Methodology: The Consequences of Straight and Curly Quotation Marks
Barrick, K., & Riegelman, A. 2021. College & Research Libraries, 82(7): 978 

 

How to Disable Smart Quotes in Microsoft Word

For: Word 365, Word 2021, Word 2019, and Word 2016

  1. On the File tab, click Options.
  2. Click Proofing, and then click AutoCorrect Options.
  3. In the AutoCorrect dialog box, do the following:
    1. Click the AutoFormat As You Type tab, and under Replace as you type, select or clear the “Straight quotes” with “smart quotes” check box.
    2. Click the AutoFormat tab, and under Replace, select or clear the “Straight quotes” with “smart quotes” check box.
  4. Click OK.